If you are buying or renting in London and you drive an EV, borough choice matters more than most people realise. The difference between the best and worst boroughs for charging access is significant. Add in risk scores and house prices and a clearer picture emerges of where you actually get good value as an EV driver.
All data comes from the EVInsight dataset, which scores every UK postcode across 50+ factors using government and statutory sources including the Land Registry, Ofcom, ONS, and the Department for Transport. House prices are averaged from Land Registry transactions in 2024 and 2025.
Risk scores are drawn from the EVInsight infrastructure risk model. Lower is better. A score of 6 to 10 is low risk for London. Above 20 reflects higher vehicle crime and collision exposure. House prices are Land Registry averages for 2024 to 2025 transactions.
The top 5 boroughs
Bexley tops the table with the joint-lowest risk score in London and strong deprivation figures. At £443,000 average it is one of the more affordable boroughs in this analysis. Good charging access, low risk, low deprivation, and a reasonable entry price. Not glamorous, genuinely practical.
Greenwich ties with Bexley on risk score but edges ahead on rapid charger distance at 0.6 miles. At £701,000 it is considerably pricier but still well below central London. The combination of very low risk and strong charging access makes it one of the best all-round boroughs for EV drivers.
Kingston is the best outer south-west borough for EV drivers. Low risk, good deprivation figures, solid charging access, and £545,000 average puts it in an affordable bracket for the area. A consistent performer across every metric we looked at.
Wandsworth has the shortest average distance to a rapid charger in the top five at 0.5 miles. The risk score is slightly higher but still low for inner London. At £747,000 it is a premium borough but you get dense charging infrastructure in return. Battersea and Clapham drive a lot of the commercial investment here.
Sutton has the shortest average distance to a rapid charger in the entire analysis at 0.4 miles, and at £420,000 it is the second most affordable borough in the top ten. The deprivation figure is more mixed than its neighbours but the charging access and price point make it a compelling practical choice.
The best value borough
Croydon is the cheapest borough in this analysis at £284,000 average and still has a 0.6 mile average distance to a rapid charger. The risk score is higher than the top boroughs, which reflects a more urban environment, but for pure charging access relative to price Croydon is hard to beat. If budget is the primary concern and you still want reasonable EV infrastructure, this is the data-backed answer.
What you are paying for at the top end
Kensington and Chelsea averages £3.1 million per property and has a risk score of 14.3, higher than Bexley, Greenwich, Kingston, Wandsworth and Sutton. You are not buying better EV infrastructure by paying more. Camden averages £1.7 million with a risk score of 19.4. Westminster averages £1.6 million with a risk score of 20.0. The most expensive boroughs are not the safest or the best served for EV drivers.
Richmond upon Thames is the exception. At £1.08 million it is expensive, but the risk score of 11.3 and IMD decile of 8.2 (the highest in the analysis) reflect genuinely lower deprivation and better infrastructure environment. You are paying for something real there.
The full picture
The pattern that emerges from this data is consistent with what we see across the UK. Commercial charging operators deploy where footfall and affluence are highest, which means the most expensive parts of London often have the most charge points in absolute terms. But risk scores tell a different story. The outer south-west boroughs (Bexley, Greenwich, Kingston, Wandsworth, Sutton) consistently combine low risk with good charging access and more affordable prices.
You can search charge points in any London borough right now on EVChargeSpot. No account, no tracking, completely free.